The Design of Voting and Rating Services within Web4Groups
نویسندگان
چکیده
The Web4Groups EU supported project is one of the Telematics Application Development Projects of the Fourth Framework Program. The target of the project is to develop a distributed World Wide Web based, non-simultaneous group communication system that can also be considered as a complete redefinition of the traditional communication services like Usenet. The paper provides with a global overview on Web4Groups system and particularly the concepts followed during the design of Voting and Rating services within Web4Groups.
منابع مشابه
Application of a Generic Voting Tool for Rating Purposes
Abstract: A highly customizable voting subsystem has been implemented as part of the Web4Groups EU supported project (Telematics Application Development Projects, Fourth Framework Program). The target of the Web4Groups project is to develop a distributed non-simultaneous group communication system with multiple access possibilities (WWW, mail, fax, etc.) and incorporating advanced groupware fun...
متن کاملEvaluating Design Solutions Using Crowds
Crowds can be used to generate and evaluate design solutions. To increase a crowdsourcing system’s effectiveness, we propose and compare two evaluation methods, one using five-point Likert scale rating and the other prediction voting. Our results indicate that although the two evaluation methods correlate, they have different goals: whereas prediction voting focuses evaluators on identifying th...
متن کاملApplication of ensemble learning techniques to model the atmospheric concentration of SO2
In view of pollution prediction modeling, the study adopts homogenous (random forest, bagging, and additive regression) and heterogeneous (voting) ensemble classifiers to predict the atmospheric concentration of Sulphur dioxide. For model validation, results were compared against widely known single base classifiers such as support vector machine, multilayer perceptron, linear regression and re...
متن کاملPragmatic Criteria in the Holistic and Analytic Rating of the Disagreement Speech Act of Iranian EFL Learners by Non-native English Speaking Teachers
onveying a strong message within a language stems from not only a linguistically appropriate utterance but also a pragmatically appropriate discourse. Broadly considering various facets of pragmatics, pragmatic assessment has not been potentially brought into perspective. To address this discourse gap, this study, guided by the principles of mixed-method design, pursued three purposes: ...
متن کاملDouble voter perceptible blind signature based electronic voting protocol
Mu et al. have proposed an electronic voting protocol and claimed that it protects anonymity of voters, detects double voting and authenticates eligible voters. It has been shown that it does not protect voter's privacy and prevent double voting. After that, several schemes have been presented to fulfill these properties. However, many of them suffer from the same weaknesses. In this p...
متن کامل